Will health care law cause employers to drop coverage?

1 Comment | This entry was posted in Health Care, Public Policy

To provide care, or not to provide care? That is one of many questions facing employers as provisions of the new federal health care law take effect.

A new survey of Fortune 100 companies conducted by the House Ways and Means Committee found businesses could save more than $28 billion a year if they eliminated employer-based health care coverage and put their employees into the taxpayer-subsidized government “exchanges” that will be created under the law. That’s even after paying $2,000 per-employee annual penalties for not providing health care coverage.

NRF Vice President Neil Trautwein went on Fox News Channel Monday to discuss the survey and provide the retail industry’s perspective.

The $2,000 penalty comes as part of the law’s “employer mandate,” which requires most businesses to provide health care coverage to full-time workers at government-mandated levels or pay a fine. The mandate is intended to encourage more companies to provide coverage. But with the fine lower than the cost of providing insurance, it could have the unintended consequence of encouraging companies to drop coverage, Trautwein said.

“In a pure dollars and cents standpoint, it could not be more clear – you save a lot of money, hundreds of millions of dollars for some of these companies, by no longer providing coverage,” Trautwein said.

NRF has supported legislation in Congress to repeal the employer mandate, and is working with the Obama Administration to ease the impact on employers of some other provisions of the law.

During the health care debate, NRF supported efforts to make health care more affordable but argued that the proper way to do so was by making it more affordable, not through government mandates.

Posted in: Health Care | Public Policy and tagged , , , , , ,
Share:

One Comment

  1. avatar Terry
    Posted May 2, 2012 at 1:06 pm | Permalink

    Perfect example of the law of unintended consequences. If Obamacare withstands the scrutiny of the Supreme Court look for this to be the next trend.

    And I can’t wait to hear how the HR hacks try to spin it as a “new benefit”.

Post a Comment

  • Posting Policy

    NRF welcomes intelligent discussion and debate from our community. We do insist that all comments must be expressed in a mature and civil tone of voice. Individuals posting rude or otherwise inappropriate material will lose their access to the discussion.

    Thank you,
    NRF

    Note: While anonymous comments are welcome, they are also moderated and may not be posted immediately. If you don't see your comment, please be patient, as it will be reviewed and posted soon if appropriate. Please do not post your comment a second time. Thank you.

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>