New trucking rule to increase costs and congestion, reduce productivity and safety

4 Comments | This entry was posted in Public Policy

Right before the end of 2011, the Department of Transportation’s Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) issued a revised Driver’s Hours-of-Service Final Rule (HOS) impacting the daily and weekly amounts that trucker drivers can drive.

The new rule is a bit complicated but the ramifications are severe and will surely be felt on America’s roadways and throughout the retail industry supply chain.

The new rule retained the 11-hour daily driving limit for truck drivers but altered the weekly restart provision to include two consecutive nights off for every driver and a mandatory rest break for truck drivers within the first eight hours of driving. While NRF was pleased with the decision to retain the 11-hour daily driving limit, we are extremely concerned with the mandatory two consecutive nights included in the restart provision.

NRF believes that these changes will drive up retailer transportation costs and make trucking less safe due to the fact that more trucks will have to be added onto our already congested roadways to make up for those drivers on mandatory breaks. NRF also contends that the FMCSA failed to truly recognize the importance of nighttime driving and early morning deliveries. As we all know, many retailers rely upon nighttime driving and early morning deliveries as a way to keep costs down and trucks off the road during peak driving times to reduce congestion with passenger vehicles.

NRF’s concerns with the new HOS rule is supported by the supply chain community, including the American Trucking Associations and the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, who contend that the rule would not improve safety (as intended) but potentially make trucking less safe because more trucks would have to be added on the roads during the busiest daytime hours in order to make up for lost productivity and reduced driving times.

NRF submitted comments to the FMCSA during the rulemaking process to explain the negative impact the proposed changes would have on the retail industry. In fact, an NRF member, Badcock Home Furnishing traveled to Washington, D.C. to testify at a Congressional hearing on how the proposed rule would negatively impact their retail business.

Even though the new rule has been published it will not become effective until July 2013, so retailers, transportation providers and others have time to challenge the rule in court or adjust their logistics plans accordingly.

Posted in: Public Policy and tagged , ,


  1. avatar Watson
    Posted January 13, 2012 at 1:28 pm | Permalink

    Personally, I’m relieved to know that drivers cannot work more than 70 hours per week which endangers everyone. Why can’t the transportation companies hire more people who will share the delivery duties? That would increase jobs without impacting traffic congestion.

  2. avatar Steven Hull
    Posted January 14, 2012 at 12:37 pm | Permalink

    We are outraged when a sleepy driver causes a fatal accident. But drivers with slightly more rest is bad economy policy?

    While many positive things come from the NRF that help our industry – Who writes these policy statements from organizations like this? I wonder how many at NRF headquarters are required to work 70 hour weeks with a mandatory 11 hours per day sitting in the same chair, focusing at high levels of concentration. Although I can believe that many lobbyists do spend many hours a day staring out a window, it is clearly not the same.

    I would love to call and find out more from management at NRF about this policy – but I’m sure no one is in the office taking calls after 5pm, or weekends or holidays etc. Just something to think about as most enjoy a three days off this weekend.

  3. avatar John
    Posted January 22, 2012 at 6:17 pm | Permalink

    “more trucks will have to be added onto our already congested roadways to make up for those drivers on mandatory breaks”


    Why can’t they just do what they’ve been doing in Europe for the past few years and add a second driver to long-haul drives? And in Germany, the Autobahn forbids trucking on Sundays and Holidays, leaving the truckers to the overnight hours. That actually alleviates traffic.

  4. Posted April 30, 2012 at 11:09 am | Permalink

    This is great news. I have known drivers who have forced themselves to work overtime. I believe that they shouldn’t be allowed to go overtime unless they don’t have a choice. When these drivers are on the road, they are not only responsible of themselves but also of the people on the road with him. If he is tired or sleepy, he is endangering everyone who is on the road.

Post a Comment

  • Posting Policy

    NRF welcomes intelligent discussion and debate from our community. We do insist that all comments must be expressed in a mature and civil tone of voice. Individuals posting rude or otherwise inappropriate material will lose their access to the discussion.

    Thank you,

    Note: While anonymous comments are welcome, they are also moderated and may not be posted immediately. If you don't see your comment, please be patient, as it will be reviewed and posted soon if appropriate. Please do not post your comment a second time. Thank you.

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>