Health reform’s anniversary — marking a missed opportunity

3 Comments | This entry was posted in Health Care, Public Policy

Today marks the one-year anniversary since passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PPACA; later shortened to the Affordable Care Act or ACA). However, I’m not sure that retailers are in all that much of a mood to celebrate this occasion.

We mourn the opportunity this law missed to focus on what really matters in health care: restraining the cost of medical care. Entitlements (e.g. Medicare, Medicaid & Social Security) — already driving the national debt and swamping both federal and state governments – received limited attention (e.g. accountable care organizations) or were expanded (Medicaid), to the states’ collective great peril. The employer mandate penalties (e.g. the employer “responsibility” provisions) are structured in a way to encourage employers (larger than 50) to dismantle the employer-based health care system beginning in 2014. We do not apologize for seeking to overturn this law or to delay its implementation or to seek to make major changes to it.

But, retailers are realists above all else. Health care reform is still the law of the land today. So, we are working hard to make the best of this massive and unnecessarily complex law. But, no wonder it is still unpopular – people struggle to understand exactly what is coming and when. NRF spends a lot of time just explaining the basics.

We give the Obama Administration credit for generally trying to make the best of a bad law. Republicans are right to say that a better law would not have required thousands of waivers. But, the Administration and its allies are also right to say that waivers are a necessary part of the transition to 2014.

For our part, we appreciate the steps taken to safeguard existing limited coverage from application of the restrictions on annual benefit limits and medical loss ratio (MLR) standards. Keeping the coverage one has now also includes keeping coverage that might not get the Good Housekeeping Seal of Coverage approval – until more affordable and comprehensive alternatives are available. These waivers – and the state waivers from MLR – make good, pragmatic sense.

But, even some erstwhile supporters – like Howard Schultz, Starbucks CEO – are having second thoughts on their past support for the law. Momentum for repeal or substantial modification is growing. By this time next year, perhaps the U.S. Supreme Court may have considered the constitutionality of key sections – especially the individual mandate for coverage.

So, give a nod to PPACA/ACA on its first birthday. Will it get a second birthday or more? Only time and hard work will tell….

Posted in: Health Care | Public Policy and tagged , , , ,


  1. Posted March 23, 2011 at 11:16 am | Permalink

    Families are already being helped by the Affordable Care Act. Read their stories and share your own here:

  2. Posted March 23, 2011 at 11:23 am | Permalink

    My point wasn’t that the law is all bad, but it could have been so much better. The employer mandate is a fatal flaw — it actually will encourage employers to drop coverage. That won’t help working families at all….

  3. avatar Jay Becraft
    Posted March 24, 2011 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    Well said!

Post a Comment

  • Posting Policy

    NRF welcomes intelligent discussion and debate from our community. We do insist that all comments must be expressed in a mature and civil tone of voice. Individuals posting rude or otherwise inappropriate material will lose their access to the discussion.

    Thank you,

    Note: While anonymous comments are welcome, they are also moderated and may not be posted immediately. If you don't see your comment, please be patient, as it will be reviewed and posted soon if appropriate. Please do not post your comment a second time. Thank you.

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>